SCIET Concepts of the Principles, Rules and Tools
The Concepts provide the necessary background to frame the ideas behind this work, while the Principles, Rules and Tools seek to isolate ideas for mathematical reasoning.
SCET Dynamics began with a conceptual question, ``What is the structure of energy?", which led into a series of "thought experiments" that resulted in this work. Originally, the ``structure of energy" meant wave forms or ``light" that could stand still. This was in 1974 and the idea seemed filled with the promise of new knowledge. I conceptualized that if this were possible it could explain how consciousness could exist independent of the body. I believed then as now that this is true.
But problems soon surfaced. Standing waves could explain much, but they would have to have been standing since the beginning of time for it to work and not only that, they would have to have pre-existed anything that they might be standing between.
It became clear that for the ``Structure of Energy" to work, it would need to be an independent theory that matter could evolve from, rather than a theory that stood beside or depended upon the existence of matter.
The Dual Voids Concept has emerged as the glue that holds SCIET Dynamics together. Consolidation says that all energy started out spread evenly through space and matter was created by consolidating it into a relatively small region. The concept of Resonance had to be defined based on the measurement of space through Subdivision and through Derivative Resonance Values, values that are the result of other values.
Examination of what must happen when resonance values are reduced through subdivision to values too small and fast to relate to our normal reality led to the development of the concept of the Infinitesimal Substrate.
The concept of Universal Sets evolved into a cornerstone of SCIET Theory because it enabled space to accomodate each value-cycle based on a point as part of universe-wide cycle.
I have generalized that if it is needed to understand but not specific enough to be used to define a paricular phenomenon, it must be a concept and not a principle, rule or tool.
|